The tests only cover the correct handling of the codesigning purpose in the certificates
in the context of the cms command line tool.
The interpretation of the certificate purpose is tested in the context of the "verify"
app. The correct handling of the cms objects is tested by other tests in 80-test_cms.t.
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/18567)
Correct configuration according to CA Browser forum:
KU: critical,digitalSignature
XKU: codeSiging
Note: I did not find any other document formally defining the requirements
for code signing certificates.
Some combinations are explicitly forbidden, some flags can be ignored
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/18567)
Code signing certificates have other properties as for example described in
CA Browser Forum documents. This leads to "unsupported certificate purpose" errors when
verifying signed objects.
This patch adds the purpose "codesign" to the table in X.509 certificate verification and
the verification parameter "code_sign" to X509_VERIFY_PARAM.
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/18567)
sslapitest has a test for multiblock writes. Since multiblock writing is
only available on some platforms the multiblock test checks whether we are
on such a platform first, and skips the test if we are not. Unfortunately
a bug in the check meant that we always skipped the test regardless of the
platform.
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Belyavskiy <beldmit@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/18983)
Fixes#18586
In order to not break existing applications the OpenSSL documentation
related to SHAKE has been updated.
Background:
All digests algorithms (including XOF's) use the bitlen as the default output length.
This results in a security strength of bitlen / 2.
This means that SHAKE128 will by default have an output length of 16
bytes and a security strength of 64 bits.
For SHAKE256 the default output length is 32 bytes and has a security
strength of 128 bits.
This behaviour was present in 1.1.1 and has been duplicated in the
provider SHAKE algorithms for 3.0.
The SHAKE XOF algorithms have a security strength of
min(bitlen, output xof length in bits / 2).
Reviewed-by: Matthias St. Pierre <Matthias.St.Pierre@ncp-e.com>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/18622)
Those 2 functions historically only ever returned 0 or 1. In OpenSSL 3.0
they were made no-ops and the documentation says they always return 0. In
fact they were returning -1. If any application was actually using these
functions then it may appear that they were actually successful (e.g. -1
could be interpreted as "true").
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/18967)
The documentation was misleading in that it suggests that this environment
variable will record information about all allocations. While this is true
it doesn't record the most useful information that you might expect such
as the requested size of the allocation! It is mainly for use in
conjunction with OPENSSL_MALLOC_FAILURES, and reports information about
what chance an allocation has of failing.
We also clarify that the mem_debug functions are actually no-ops in 3.0.
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/18967)
The -provider and -propquery options did not work on dgst when using it
for signing or signature verification (including HMACs). Fix this and
add tests that check that operations that would usually fail with the
FIPS provider work when run with
| -provider default -propquery '?fips!=yes'
Additionally, modify the behavior of dgst -list to also use the current
library context and property query. This reduces the output below the
headline "Supported digests" to a list of the digest algorithms that
will actually work with the current configuration, which is closer to
what users probably expect with this headline.
See also 30b2c3592e, which previously
fixed the same problem in dsaparam and gendsa. See also the initial
report in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2094956.
Signed-off-by: Clemens Lang <cllang@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Belyavskiy <beldmit@gmail.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/18717)
Running bio_tfo_test under asan yields
==172342==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks
Direct leak of 380 byte(s) in 5 object(s) allocated from:
#0 0x3ff89bba251 in malloc (/lib64/libasan.so.8+0xba251)
#1 0x3ff88cf9fd5 in gaih_inet.constprop.0 (/lib64/libc.so.6+0xf9fd5)
#2 0x3ff88cfaf6f in getaddrinfo (/lib64/libc.so.6+0xfaf6f)
#3 0x3ff89ba52a9 in __interceptor_getaddrinfo.part.0 (/lib64/libasan.so.8+0xa52a9)
#4 0x1004909 in test_fd_tfo test/bio_tfo_test.c:241
[...]
and fails the test.
Fix this by freeing the return addrinfo on exit.
Signed-off-by: Juergen Christ <jchrist@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Todd Short <todd.short@me.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/18979)
Running test_tfo_cli under asan yields
==166214==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: heap-buffer-overflow on address 0x60700000d57c at pc 0x03ffa004ed86 bp 0x03ffe2977e80 sp 0x03ffe2977668
READ of size 112 at 0x60700000d57c thread T0
#0 0x3ffa004ed85 in memcpy (/lib64/libasan.so.8+0x4ed85)
#1 0x3ff9f3615b7 in BIO_ADDR_dup crypto/bio/bio_addr.c:77
[...]
and fails the test.
Fix this by copying the right structure of the union.
Signed-off-by: Juergen Christ <jchrist@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Todd Short <todd.short@me.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/18979)
s390x GHASH assembler implementation assumed it was called from a
gcm128_context structure where the Xi paramter to the ghash function was
embedded in that structure. Since the structure layout resembles the paramter
block required for kimd-GHASH, the assembler code simply assumed the 128 bytes
after Xi are the hash subkey.
This assumption was broken with the introduction of AES-GCM-SIV which uses the
GHASH implementation without a gcm128_context structure. Furthermore, the
bytes following the Xi input parameter to the GHASH function do not contain
the hash subkey. To fix this, we remove the assumption about the calling
context and build the parameter block on the stack. This requires some
copying of data to and from the stack. While this introduces a performance
degradation, new systems anyway use kma for GHASH/AES-GCM.
Finally fixes#18693 for s390x.
Signed-off-by: Juergen Christ <jchrist@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Todd Short <todd.short@me.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/18939)
Increase the signature's length, that is passed to EVP_DigestSign(). The
implementation should set this parameter back to the actual length, that
has been written.
This (oneshot_digestsign_test_run()) fails for the ed25519/ ed448
implementation of s390 prio the fix. The change in digestsign_test_run()
follows the same pattern and is for collecting bonus points.
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc>
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Todd Short <todd.short@me.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/18928)
The s390x provides its custom implementation for the creation of the
ed448 and ed25519 signatures. Unfortunately it does not set the size.
Users that rely of this return parameter end up with wrong values and
will compare wrong sizes of signature.
Set the proper size of the returned signature on success. Set an error
if the signing operation fails.
Fixes: #18912
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc>
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Todd Short <todd.short@me.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/18928)
Out of range values could possibly be returned due to a lack of range checking.
Very unlikely to be exploitable for our provider because sensible values are
returned for all ciphers.
Also fixed the defaulting code so that the cipher's IV length is returned if
the cipher ctx doesn't support getting.
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Belyavskiy <beldmit@gmail.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/18875)
Fixes#18690
In some circumstances, it's possible that when using an external
database for the session cache, that pulling in an entry from that
cache to the internal cache will cause the newly added entry to
be deleted from the internal cache. This is likely to happen when
the internal cache is set to have a small size, and the newly added
entry's timeout places it at the end of the cache list.
This could be fixed by updating the timestamp of the session (via
`SSL_SESSION_set_time()` or `SSL_SESSION_set_timeout()`) before
adding to the cache. But that may not be desireable.
Reviewed-by: Viktor Dukhovni <viktor@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/18905)
